Multiple Sclerosis: Understanding Neurological Deterioration and How Disease-Modifying Therapies Work

Multiple Sclerosis: Understanding Neurological Deterioration and How Disease-Modifying Therapies Work

Multiple sclerosis isn’t just about flare-ups and fatigue. For many people, the real battle begins long after the last relapse fades - in the quiet, invisible damage inside the brain and spinal cord. While inflammation gets all the attention, it’s the neurological deterioration - the slow, steady loss of nerve fibers - that leads to lasting disability. And here’s the hard truth: current treatments don’t stop it.

What’s Actually Happening Inside the Nervous System?

Multiple sclerosis starts with the immune system attacking the myelin sheath - the fatty insulation around nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord. When myelin breaks down, electrical signals slow down or get blocked. That’s why you might lose vision, feel numbness, or struggle to walk during a relapse. But here’s what most people don’t realize: the damage doesn’t stop there.

Under the microscope, scientists see something worse: axons - the long, wire-like parts of nerve cells - begin to fray, swell, and die. These aren’t just damaged by inflammation. They’re starving. Studies show that in chronic MS lesions, up to 50% of demyelinated axons have fewer mitochondria, the energy factories cells need to survive. Without myelin, axons use up to 10 times more energy to send signals. Over time, they burn out.

This isn’t temporary. Unlike inflammation, which can heal, axonal loss is permanent. Once a nerve fiber dies, it doesn’t grow back in the central nervous system. That’s why someone who had a good recovery after their first relapse might still end up needing a cane 10 years later. The damage isn’t from the flare-up - it’s from what happened afterward.

The Three Faces of MS: Relapsing, Progressive, and the Hidden Shift

Most people are diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). About 85% of cases start this way - sudden attacks, then periods of stability. Drugs like interferons, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab can cut relapses by 30-50%. But these medications only target the immune system’s fire. They don’t fix the burning wires.

Over time, many people with RRMS shift into secondary progressive MS (SPMS). This isn’t a new diagnosis - it’s a progression. The relapses become less frequent, but the decline continues. MRI scans show fewer new lesions. Blood tests show less inflammation. Yet, the person keeps losing function. Why? Because the damage has moved inside the nervous system itself.

In SPMS, inflammation doesn’t vanish - it changes. Instead of immune cells flooding in from the bloodstream, they gather in the meninges, the membranes covering the brain. Here, B cells form clusters like tiny immune factories, releasing toxins that slowly poison nearby nerves. This is why drugs that work in RRMS often fail in SPMS. They’re designed to block immune cells from entering the brain. But in progressive MS, the damage is already inside.

And then there’s primary progressive MS (PPMS), affecting about 15% of patients from the start. No relapses. No remissions. Just steady decline. For these individuals, neurodegeneration is the main driver - not inflammation. Current disease-modifying therapies have barely any effect on PPMS.

A fraying neuron axon surrounded by dimming mitochondria in a shadowy brain environment.

Why Disease-Modifying Therapies Fall Short

There are 21 FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS. Each one targets a different part of the immune system. Some deplete B cells. Others trap immune cells in lymph nodes. Some block molecules that let immune cells cross into the brain.

They work - for relapses. They reduce new lesions on MRI. They lower hospital visits. But they don’t stop brain shrinkage. They don’t slow the loss of gray matter. They don’t preserve walking ability long-term.

A 2023 study found that brain volume loss - especially in the gray matter - predicted disability progression better than relapse rates or lesion counts. That’s the real warning sign. And no current DMT is approved specifically to protect axons or rebuild myelin.

This creates a cruel gap: patients are told their treatment is working because their MRI looks better - but their legs still feel heavier, their balance worse, their memory slipping. The treatment is doing its job - just not the job that matters most for long-term quality of life.

What’s Next? The New Frontiers in MS Treatment

Scientists are no longer just fighting inflammation. They’re trying to save nerves.

One promising path is targeting mitochondrial failure. If axons are running out of energy, can we give them more? Trials are testing drugs that boost mitochondrial function - like ibudilast, which showed signs of slowing brain atrophy in a 2021 phase II trial.

Another approach focuses on sodium channels. After demyelination, axons overwork to keep signals going. This floods them with sodium, which triggers toxic reactions. Drugs like phenytoin and siponimod are being tested to block these channels and reduce axonal stress.

Remyelination is the holy grail. Can we get the body to regrow myelin? Experimental drugs like opicinumab and clemastine are trying to wake up the brain’s own repair cells - oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Early results are mixed, but the idea is clear: if we can remyelinate axons, we might restore function and prevent degeneration.

Even the immune system is being rethought. Instead of just suppressing it, researchers are exploring ways to make it protective. Some studies suggest certain immune cells can actually support nerve repair. The goal isn’t to shut down immunity - it’s to retrain it.

A person walking through a forest with glowing neural roots, symbolizing nerve preservation.

What You Can Do Right Now

While we wait for better drugs, there are things that help slow decline.

Exercise isn’t just good for mood - it’s neuroprotective. A 2023 study in the Journal of Neurology found that MS patients who did 30 minutes of aerobic exercise five times a week had slower gray matter loss over two years. Strength training helped too. Movement tells your brain to keep wiring intact.

Vitamin D matters. Low levels are linked to higher relapse rates and faster progression. Most experts recommend 2,000-4,000 IU daily, especially in places like New Zealand where winter sunlight is weak.

Quit smoking. Smoking doubles the risk of progressing from RRMS to SPMS. It’s not just about lungs - it’s about oxygen supply to nerves.

Manage stress. Chronic stress raises cortisol, which may worsen inflammation and reduce the brain’s ability to repair itself. Mindfulness, yoga, and even regular walks in nature have shown measurable benefits in small trials.

And don’t ignore cognitive health. Brain games, reading, learning new skills - these aren’t just hobbies. They build cognitive reserve. People who stay mentally active show slower decline in memory and processing speed, even with similar levels of brain damage.

The Real Challenge: Measuring What Matters

Doctors still rely on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) - a 10-point scale based on walking ability and reflexes. But it’s outdated. Someone with severe fatigue, brain fog, or hand weakness might score the same as someone who walks slowly but feels fine. That’s why researchers now use the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), which measures walking speed, hand dexterity, and memory.

The future of MS care will depend on better tools: quantitative MRI that measures axon density, blood tests that detect neurofilament light chain (a protein released when nerves die), and wearable sensors that track movement changes day by day.

Right now, the goal is simple: keep the nerves alive longer. The next generation of treatments won’t just stop relapses. They’ll protect the wires. And that’s what will change lives.

10 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Saurabh Tiwari

    December 3, 2025 AT 12:24
    this is wild tbh 🤯 i had no idea axons were just starving to death like that. my cousin with ms said her legs feel like they're dragging through wet cement, and now it makes sense - her nerves are running on fumes. why aren't we giving them energy drinks?
  • Image placeholder

    Kristen Yates

    December 5, 2025 AT 01:26
    I appreciate the clarity of this post. The distinction between inflammation and neurodegeneration is something rarely explained well. It's not just about stopping flares - it's about preserving the person behind them.
  • Image placeholder

    Paul Santos

    December 6, 2025 AT 21:02
    Ah yes, the classical reductionist paradigm of MS as merely an autoimmune disorder - quaint, really. The real narrative lies in the epiphenomenal collapse of bioenergetic homeostasis within the CNS microenvironment. We're not treating MS; we're applying immunological bandaids to a neurodegenerative hemorrhage. 🤓
  • Image placeholder

    Sheryl Lynn

    December 8, 2025 AT 10:44
    You know what’s tragic? We’ve got CRISPR, quantum computing, and space tourism - but we can’t regrow a damn axon. It’s like we’ve mastered the cosmos but forgot how to fix our own wiring. The irony is poetic. And devastating.
  • Image placeholder

    Chris Wallace

    December 10, 2025 AT 04:26
    I’ve been reading up on this since my sister was diagnosed. The part about mitochondrial depletion hit me hard. It’s not just damage - it’s starvation. And the fact that we’re still measuring progress by whether someone can walk ten feet… it feels like we’re using a ruler to measure a hurricane. I wish more doctors understood this.
  • Image placeholder

    John Morrow

    December 10, 2025 AT 08:00
    The entire paradigm of MS treatment is a structural failure of translational neuroscience. DMTs were designed on the assumption that inflammation is the primary driver - a hypothesis rooted in 1980s immunology and reinforced by pharmaceutical incentives. The data now unequivocally demonstrates that axonal degeneration is the dominant pathological correlate of disability progression, yet regulatory frameworks remain anchored to lesion burden and relapse frequency as surrogate endpoints. This is not a scientific gap - it is a systemic betrayal of patient outcomes. The fact that we still use EDSS as a gold standard in 2024 is an indictment of our entire clinical infrastructure.
  • Image placeholder

    Shubham Pandey

    December 11, 2025 AT 18:03
    so basically we’re just watching people fade away while pharma makes money off mri scans
  • Image placeholder

    Elizabeth Farrell

    December 13, 2025 AT 10:11
    I want to add something gentle but important - exercise isn’t just ‘good for you.’ For people with MS, movement is medicine. It doesn’t cure, but it whispers to the nervous system: ‘stay alive.’ I’ve seen friends who started walking daily, or doing yoga in a chair, and their brain fog lifted, their balance steadied. It’s not flashy, but it’s real. And it’s something we can all do today, while waiting for the next breakthrough.
  • Image placeholder

    Sandi Allen

    December 13, 2025 AT 14:57
    I’ve been following this for years. And let me tell you - the real reason they don’t fix neurodegeneration? Because the FDA, Big Pharma, and the NIH are all in bed with the same corporations that profit from lifelong immunosuppressants. They don’t want a cure - they want customers. You think they’d spend billions on remyelination if it meant people got better in 2 years? No. They need you on drugs forever. Wake up. This isn’t science - it’s a business model.
  • Image placeholder

    John Webber

    December 13, 2025 AT 19:43
    i think the real problem is we keep calling it ms like its one thing but its not. its like saying cancer is one disease. some people just need to stop smoking and take vit d and maybe they dont even need the fancy drugs. i know a guy who did that and he walks fine now. maybe its not all about the nerves dying maybe its just bad lifestyle? just saying.

Write a comment